-
Canadian Courts Hear Foreign Human Rights Cases
January 02, 2018
An article in The National Post highlights three rulings in Canada that may demonstrate a new willingness by the Canadian judiciary to hear claims of human rights violations committed on foreign soil by subsidiaries of Canadian mining companies.
-
Article: BHR Due Diligence Must Consider Broad "Impacts"
January 02, 2018
David Birchall, a Fellow of the Business and Human Rights Journal, writes on the need for corporations to include in their business and human rights (BHR) due-diligence assessments human rights "impacts," such as tax avoidance and high pricing of important products, that do not reach the level of a "violation" of international human rights law.
-
NGO Seeks Funding for Community-Led BHR Mechanisms
January 02, 2018
Irit Tamir of Oxfam America calls on national governments to provide funding to local communities to participate in existing corporate "grievance mechanisms" or establish their own processes to investigate corporate actions that allegedly violate the business and human rights (BHR) agenda in these communities.
-
Commentator: Consider Mental Health in BHR Remedies
January 02, 2018
Jo Reyes of the Global Business Initiative on Human Rights calls for companies to perform a comprehensive assessment of the need to include mental-health considerations in their business and human rights (BHR) remedial mechanisms.
-
UN Group Warns of Lack of Independence of NCPs
January 02, 2018
A November blog post from the UN Working Group on business and human rights (BHR) issues calls on states to look to the provisions of the UN Guiding Principles on BHR in reforming their National Contact Points (NCPs) of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to ensure these NCPs are independent and provide effective remedies for alleged BHR violations.
Copyright 2025 Global Governance Watch. All Rights Reserved.
A project of The Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies