Global Governance Watch^©

Features

Introduction

After World War II, with the founding of the Council of Europe and the institutions that would later become the European Union, Europe embarked on an uncertain path toward what some intended to be a form of pan-European cooperation in economic and human rights matters and what others desired to be the first step toward a "United States of Europe." The result has been a sweeping transfer of power from national capitols to EU institutions and significant EU regulatory and legal oversight on issues once clearly a matter of exclusive national concern. Along the way, treaty amendments and the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union and European Court of Human Rights have given rise to robust objections from "euro-skeptics," who are insisting that their national governments should "claw back" powers from the entire range of European institutions. This section examines recent developments in this debate, particularly on the subjects of human rights, law and justice, finance and trade, and the democratic impacts of the expanding authority of the European institutions.

Democracy Impacts

The unprecedented expansion of the European Union and institutions created under the European Convention on Human Rights have led politicians, journalists, scholars, and others to warn of the erosion of democracy, based on the concept of the traditional nation-state, in favor of a new form of government by supranational bureaucracy. In response, many of these commentators have called for the broad repatriation of powers from the European institutions to national governments, or for countries’ withdrawal from these institutions altogether, as they seek to avoid the gradual shift of control from citizens to elite, distant politicians and experts. This focus area observes trends in the broad balance of power between the European institutions and the national governments and contains current developments in the debate between those who wish for more centralization of power in supranational institutions and those who advocate for less.

Documents

Resources

Commentary

Democracy Impacts

Cummings Describes Necessary Focus of U.K. "Out" Campaign

July 14, 2014

In a blog post, Dominic Cummings summarizes his recent report detailing the disenchantment in the U.K. with policies of the Conservative Government relating to the EU and immigration, and describes the need for small business and other support of the campaign to leave the EU in order to persuade swing voters.
AfD Seeks Grouping with U.K. Conservatives

June 20, 2014

The U.K. Conservatives will decide whether they will support the German anti-euro party Alternative for Germany's joining the European Conservatives and Reformists grouping in the European Parliament, a decision that may risk an alliance for EU reform with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Blair Calls for Program of Change in Response to EU Elections

June 20, 2014

In the wake of the recent European Parliamentary election results, which saw large gains by "euroskeptic" parties, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair argues that European institutions must re-address the balance of power between the EU and the member states.
EU Election Outcome Sends Message to Politicians

June 20, 2014

John Fund writes on National Review Online that following an EU election in which parties supporting the return of sovereignty from Brussels to national governments earned clear-cut gains in many countries, politicians will ignore the message of decentralization sent by voters at their peril.

Total Records: 1124

<< < 111 112 113

eResources

Copyright 2024 Global Governance Watch. All Rights Reserved.

A project of The Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies