Monograph Criticizes UNAIDS Spending Priorities
ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
To the extent that UN agencies pursue global health regulation policies and programs, they need to do so in a transparent and objective manner. This implies dealing honestly with the underlying health issues upon which they justify their global governance ambitions.
In a monograph published earlier this year, Professor James Chin of the University of California at Berkeley calls into question the spending priorities of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). According to Chin, UNAIDS has misrepresented the nature of the HIV/AIDS pandemic by overestimating the pervasiveness of HIV, insisting that the AIDS pandemic has been on the rise, and overstating the risk of an HIV epidemic in “general” populations. These misconceptions have caused UNAIDS to focus on insignificant areas of the fight against an HIV/AIDS epidemic, leading to “billions…wasted on unnecessary AIDS prevention programmes.”
Chin admits that UNAIDS’ most recent reports acknowledge that the incidence of HIV infections is not as prevalent as originally thought, and that we are observing a declining trend in the AIDS pandemic. However, UNAIDS continues to insist that poverty and discrimination are major causal factors of HIV infections, and, as such, have the potential to lead to a large-scale heterosexual epidemic which will affect the “general” population. To the contrary, Chin argues that, while poverty and discrimination are factors, those most at risk of contracting the disease are communities that participate in “promiscuous” behavior not common to the general public, such as networks of injecting drug users (IDU), homosexual males (MSM) and female sex workers (FSW).
From Chin’s perspective, in spite of epidemiological evidence to the contrary, UNAIDS persists in its socially and politically correct “exaggeration of the potential for HIV to spread into the ‘general’ population…partly to avoid further stigmatization of persons with the highest levels of HIV risk behaviors.” This refusal to acknowledge the unlikelihood of a “generalized” HIV epidemic has led to a substantial misallocation of funds, as UNAIDS invests significant amounts of money into HIV education programs directed at groups that are at “minimal to no risk of any exposure to HIV.” Devoting limited resources to such superfluous and ineffective programs means that there is less to be spent on much more urgent public health needs, such as HIV treatment programs and health programs aimed at “easily preventable diseases” that affect millions living in developing countries.
Chin acknowledges that the prevention of HIV/AIDS remains a major global problem and that UNAIDS can help to solve it. However, it is important to emphasize that this challenge is localized within specific communities, and poses very little risk to the general population as a whole. According to Chin, “continued denial of these realities will lead to further erosion of whatever credibility UNAIDS and other mainstream AIDS agencies and experts may still have, thereby seriously damaging the future fight against this disease.”
A JOINT PROGRAM OF
