Obviously Britain can't leave Europe, but it can leave the EU

The Yes campaign is misleadingly using the terms 'Europe' for 'EU' to try and bolster its dodgy arguments in the referendum campaign

Boris Johnson - Telegraph View: The Leave campaign now has a standard bearer in Boris Johnson
London Mayor Boris Johnson Credit: Photo: GETTY IMAGES

In an interview with Der Spiegel, Boris Johnson pointed out: “we can't leave Europe, we're part of the European continent”. This has led to a number of people, including some journalists, to spectacularly miss the point the Mayor is making. We cannot leave the continent of Europe no more than Kenya could separate itself from Africa.

In an EU referendum the British public will be voting on whether to remain or leave the European Union – the clue's in the name.

The distinction between "Europe" and "the EU" should not be underestimated. While this conflation is perhaps innocuous to some, it has the potential to seriously skew voters’ understanding of the debate as they weigh up what Britain’s future relationship with the EU should look like.

Using the "EU" and "Europe" as interchangeable is accidental by some, but for others though it is part of a concerted effort to muddy the waters by campaigners determined to keep Britain in the EU whatever the cost.

Should Britain stay in or get out of the EU? Polling since 1977
Polling Stay In Get Out
October 1977 53 47
May 1978 47 53
March 1979 35 65
March 1980 29 71
March 1981 36 64
March 1983 40 60
June 1984 51 49
September 1987 55 45
1989 67 33
November 1990 68 32
June 1991 70 30
December 1991 67 33
5-6 June 1992 60 40
10-13 June 1992 62 38
21-25 October 1993 54 46
11-30 April 1994 59 41
23-26 May 1996 53 47
27-29 November 1996 52 48
15 April 1997 50 50
25-28 April 1997 52 48
2-3 October 1997 54 46
13-14 November 1997 58 42
25-30 June 1998 54 46
21-24 May 1999 53 47
10-11 June 1999 53 47
13-14 October 1999 55 45
27-29 October 1999 48 52
22-27 June 2000 62 38
29-30 September 2000 48 52
24-25 November 2000 53 47
15-21 March 2001 48 52
30 April -1 May 2001 53 47
22-May-01 51 49
20-22 June 2003 54 46
20-22 September 2007 56 44
22-24 October 2011 46  54 
10-13 November 2012  48 52
10-12 May 2014 59 41
 11-14 October 2014 61 39
June 2015 61 27
Ipsos MORI

When the nascent "Yes" campaign was announced last month, they boldly proclaimed that their campaign was “drawing together all the various strands of opinion that wants to keep Britain in Europe”. The use of the word "Europe" rather than "EU" was deliberate and represents an attempt to scare the electorate into thinking that a potential referendum "No" vote would mean leaving Europe and cutting the UK off from the world, rather than the reality of it meaning leaving an unreformed European Union and opening ourselves up to a globalised world, not restricting Britain to a regionalised one.

The attempt to mislead had been repeated elsewhere by prospective parts of the "In" effort. The European Movement carries a banner on its website front page incorrectly asserting that one in ten jobs in the UK are “dependent on Europe.” Even if you ignore the conflation, claims about jobs depending on EU membership have been independently rubbished time and time again, most recently by the Institute for Economic Affairs.

A fortnight ago, the lobby group "Universities UK" launched their "Universities for Europe" campaign with the rallying call: "Universities back staying in Europe".

Again, as if treating the terms "EU" and "Europe" as one and the same was not misleading enough (only 28 of the more than 50 countries in Europe are EU members), "Universities for Europe" then went on to make a series of dodgy claims about how universities would lose significant amount of funding if Britain were to leave the EU – something that we at Business for Britain and others were swift to rebut.

While the claims published by the "In" side on their websites may only reach a relatively small portion of the electorate at the moment, they have the ability to gain far more traction if repeated by print and broadcast media outlets. Journalists themselves must be careful not to fall into the trap of treating ‘Europe’ and ‘the EU’ as simply interchangeable terms.

Nick Robinson does this in his excellent election notebook, hopefully he will not repeat this in his much deserved new role on the Today programme. While for some this may mean altering habits that have been built up over many years, the importance of the decision which the voters will make in the referendum demands that everyone, but particularly national broadcasters, assess the way they report or seek to influence the EU debate.

Over the next year or so, an almost innumerable number of claims will be made and facts advanced about Britain’s place in the EU, and the consequences of both a "YES" and "NO" vote.

Robust debate and a full airing of the issues is to be encouraged, but must not be done at the expense of a discussion which is rooted in the facts and seeks to inform voters who will be looking for authoritative sources of information to help them make up their minds.

Britain will not leave Europe, but it may well take back control from the EU if it is unable to put its relationship with that political construct on a sustainable footing.

The approach of the Yes campaign so far, in misusing the terms "EU" and "Europe", does not bode well for the future.

Matthew Elliott is Chief Executive of Business for Britain